DISCIPLES OF CLAUDE
Watchlist · thesis ledger
Book

The register

Every name the room is watching, grouped by its side of the book. The claim leads; expand a row for its full record. The small chart is the price tape for context — the tape is not the verdict.

Filter and sort

Filtered: 1 of 31 register rows shown · clear.

SUPPLY SIDE · LONG1
Beyond1
CACI long · sovereign stagnation LOCKED−4.4% since added to list−5.3% called side since lock · last close 599.40 (Oct 8) · high close 627.06 · low close 581.85 · 18 days since lock · called side since filed Sep 20: −4.4%

The auditor of the machine, owned before the audit exists. The mechanism is procurement, not technology: the frontier labs have asked in public for third-party evaluators, and the federal government does not employ the people who could do that work at model scale — so if the ask becomes a requirement, the requirement becomes a contract, and contracts of that shape go to the firms already cleared to sit inside the DoD and the intelligence community. CACI is one of two or three such firms with the clearances, the cyber and signals bench and the past performance to be handed model-evaluation, assurance and red-teaming work the day it is funded. The thesis does not need commercial AI to freeze; it needs one printed award naming AI model evaluation or assurance, and a backlog that keeps growing while it waits. The expression is the common. The honest tension is printed with the position: the catalyst is a bill that has not been introduced and a partnership that has not been announced — the packet's inference, not a print — and the sovereign-demand leg already lives in the book under BAH and PLTR. The kill takes both halves: no qualifying federal AI-evaluation award by mid-2027 AND funded backlog falling year over year at two consecutive prints. Verdict due June 30, 2027.

Falsified if No federal award naming AI model evaluation, assurance, red-teaming or licensing is made to CACI by 2027-06-30 (SAM.gov contract award notices; CACI 8-K/press releases) AND CACI funded backlog declines y/y at two consecutive quarterly prints (CACI 10-Q, first-release vintage).Verdict due June 2027 · 264 days out
1× CARRY Ethan · Watching · Locked since Sep 21, 2026
Open the full record →
2026-06-06 · no assessment2026-06-13 · no assessment2026-06-20 · no assessment2026-06-27 · no assessment2026-07-04 · no assessment2026-07-11 · no assessment2026-07-18 · no assessment2026-07-25 · no assessment2026-08-01 · no assessment2026-08-08 · no assessment2026-08-15 · no assessment2026-08-22 · no assessment2026-08-29 · no assessment2026-09-05 · no assessment2026-09-12 · no assessment2026-09-19 · no assessment2026-10-03 · CARRY
Thesis stands — no dated test this edition.
LONG since Sep 21 — sovereign stagnation · answers by June 2027 · 264 days out · last edition (Oct 3): CARRY — the thesis stood, no dated test · tape since lock: 8 of 14 sessions with the call
CACI fiscal Q1-2027 results (first print after registration) — funded backlog y/y; award scan (pin from issuer calendar at lock) · 2026-10-22 · CACI quarterly release + 10-Q (first-release vintage); SAM.gov award notices
Coming up: Earnings Oct 28 · Verdict due June 2027 · 264 days out
Owner rationale

The auditor of the machine, owned before the audit exists. The mechanism is procurement, not technology: the frontier labs have asked in public for third-party evaluators, and the federal government does not employ the people who could do that work at model scale — so if the ask becomes a requirement, the requirement becomes a contract, and contracts of that shape go to the firms already cleared to sit inside the DoD and the intelligence community. CACI is one of two or three such firms with the clearances, the cyber and signals bench and the past performance to be handed model-evaluation, assurance and red-teaming work the day it is funded. The thesis does not need commercial AI to freeze; it needs one printed award naming AI model evaluation or assurance, and a backlog that keeps growing while it waits. The expression is the common. The honest tension is printed with the position: the catalyst is a bill that has not been introduced and a partnership that has not been announced — the packet's inference, not a print — and the sovereign-demand leg already lives in the book under BAH and PLTR. The kill takes both halves: no qualifying federal AI-evaluation award by mid-2027 AND funded backlog falling year over year at two consecutive prints. Verdict due June 30, 2027.

Edition assessments
2026-10-03 · CARRY

2 dead names render in the graveyard.

Closes through Oct 8 · grades through 2026-10-03

Moved most
Moved most

VST moved most: down 6.3% into Oct 8 · $10.58 a share.

Moved most = the largest one-day percentage move among register names, computed from verified adjacent-session closing prices — both closes present, one source, real volume. Ties break to the larger dollar move; under a 0.25% top move the tape is called quiet. A price move is context, never a verdict.

Points

Member point differential — one point per signed percent of tape move since each act's prior close; locked theses count ×2.0. Sums, not rates: every total carries its act count.

Ethan−171.2 28 scored act(s)differential needs two members with scored acts
EXE long −7.7% ×2.0 = −15.4 · TLT short −3.7% ×2.0 = +7.4 · TSM short +5.4% ×2.0 = −10.7 · MU short +2.0% ×2.0 = −3.9 · RCL short +14.5% ×2.0 = −29.0 · SNDK short −10.2% ×2.0 = +20.4 · EPD long −5.5% ×2.0 = −11.0 · VST long +6.4% ×2.0 = +12.9 · CCJ long −12.0% ×2.0 = −24.1 · CEG long +2.3% ×2.0 = +4.6 · NXT long +6.0% ×2.0 = +11.9 · ETN long −7.7% ×2.0 = −15.4 · XOM long +1.5% ×2.0 = +3.1 · STLA short −6.2% ×2.0 = +12.4 · GOOGL long −0.36% ×2.0 = −0.7 · CVE long −3.5% ×2.0 = −6.9 · ICE long +2.7% ×2.0 = +5.3 · MP long −14.7% ×2.0 = −29.5 · FDX short −6.5% ×2.0 = +13.0 · CME long +0.16% ×2.0 = +0.3 · NVDA long +3.7% ×2.0 = +7.4 · BWXT long −12.0% ×2.0 = −23.9 · ORA long −17.4% ×2.0 = −34.8 · DELL short +35.2% ×2.0 = −70.4 · CSX short −2.8% ×2.0 = +5.6 · ODFL short −2.9% ×2.0 = +5.7 · DHI short −1.6% ×2.0 = +3.2 · CACI long −4.4% ×2.0 = −8.8
Points are tape arithmetic, not a verdict — no points figure grades a proposition or a person.